Climate Thievatology
- November 29th, 2009
- By brian
- Write comment
I read the headlines about the climate change email scandal where someone hacked into the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit and stole a bunch of emails and posted them on the net supposedly to prove some sort of cover up by scientists trying to hide the idea man-made global warming is a hoax, but I never read any of the emails or much of the news/blog coverage. I mentioned it to Viv and her first reaction was “It’s BS. Somebody STOLE those emails and said there was a scandal going on. Are you going to trust the people who STOLE that information?”
After another few days thinking about it I came across this link on Boing Boing. I haven’t read anything but the main article, but there is a large set of links to other coverage that I plan to read. Maggie Koerth-Baker raises some interesting questions about the whole scandal and I’ve also heard that it was planned to cause an uproar prior to next month’s global warming summit and to embarrass the Obama administration.
As I see it there are a few things to keep in mind about the situation regardless of which side you’re on with this issue, and if you believe mankind has helped cause global warming or not:
- The data was supposedly stolen, although I presume some of it could have been fabricated and passed off as legitimate so it’s in question.
- If not fabricated the data might have been edited before being posted on the net so it’s in question.
- If not fabricated or edited, was data cherry picked from a larger body of data to support an opposing viewpoint? It’s happened in the last 10 years several times by the right wing, so it’s in question.
- The data itself is all in question because it was obtained illegally. It calls into question the integrity of those posting the data, so it’s in question… It’s like getting a confession from someone through torture. You can’t take the confession seriously.
- What was the motive for the theft?
- Why did they do it?
- Were they paid to do it?
- Who paid them?
- What did they hope to accomplish? (Either the perpetrators are right-wing techno-zealot-geeks who want to embarrass the Obama administration, or they got paid by the right-wing zealots to do it… Are there other explanations I’m not fantasizing, I mean considering?)
In my opinion it reeks of recent right-wing political tactics… Start a rumor and make the other side defend itself. It doesn’t matter how ugly the rumor is or if it’s true, just get it out there and let the media propagate it. It’s been used in recent politics to influence public opinion quite dramatically and can be very effective in swaying public opinion about a candidate, or in this case an issue. I can’t think of any other reasons for it.
Use your heads. Don’t believe everything you read on the internets. You betcha!








